Verylatestarter wrote:Robert
maybe a better categorization would be:-
The good
the bad and
the ugly.
Clearly what is good is in the 'eye of the beholder' so strict definitions should be irrelevant.
my (limited) experience is; try some good ones and knowledge/observation will reveal further great hills to try and sometimes it's better to revisit a good hill than tick off a new dull one.
'Keep on pushing'
John
Quite so, and my actual approach to going walking is based largely on what looks interesting. But I have the kind of mind that wants to make nice orderly lists of chaotic things. It's better than trying to make nature nice and orderly, I suppose.