Mountainlove wrote:Cairngormwanderer wrote:Glen Lyon Estate, from memory, has an appalling record for trying to dissuade people from walking there. I wonder what makes their deer more skittish than deer anywhere else in Scotland? (In any case, I've always reckoned that I'd be less likely to be scared shitless by a bunch of brightly clad walkers wandering about, than I would of some guy shotting at me, but of course I'm not a deer on the Glen Lyon Estate.)
Well I can understand them a bit...if they have customers who want to shoot the deer and they cant find any, they are loosing business...guess a hunter wont go back, if they can go to other estates where deer is easier to locate!
Where are these other estates where deer are easier to locate? All you folk who are avoiding Glen Lyon are walking over them and presumably scaring all their deer instead. Curiously, a wee bit more than three decades ago, I went out with a stalker and his client. He didn't get a head that day at all, but was so pleased because he had had a day's 'proper' hunting, where it wasn't just a case of turning up and shooting a beast, but where he had to work for it.
But back to the point, while it is perfectly acceptable for an estate to say they are shooting on a particular hill or coire that day, to attempt a blanket ban like that is not only out of order but completely contrary to the spirit (if perhaps not the letter) of the access legislation which was so hard fought for. I won't interfere with someone's shooting if they act in a responsible manner themselves, but in my book this estate is taking a loan.