walkhighlands

This forum is for general discussion about walking and scrambling... If writing a report or sharing your experiences from a route, please use the other boards.

Compleat or complete?

Compleat or complete?


Postby CharlesT » Thu May 29, 2014 8:38 am

Without wishing to stir up controversy a recent report on here of a member reaching the magic 282 has re-ignited my curiosity on the term used to describe this.

Compleat is an archaic form of the current usage which is complete. Can anyone enlighten me as to why compleat seems to be used to denote completion of the Munros rather than the modern complete? Is this a harking back to a bygone age tinged with nostalgia or perhaps a feeling the archaic word is somehow more romantic?

What do members think?
User avatar
CharlesT
Mountaineer
 
Posts: 4502
Munros:156   Corbetts:2
Hewitts:262
Wainwrights:214   Islands:2
Joined: Dec 22, 2011
Location: West Oxfordshire

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby Astronick » Thu May 29, 2014 8:51 am

From the SMC page on the Munros:

Incidentally, the archaic spelling compleation is often used here, as a nod both to Izaak Walton's book 'The Compleat Angler', and a compliment to another noteworthy sport - Munro-bagging.
User avatar
Astronick
Stravaiging
 
Posts: 194
Munros:220   Corbetts:52
Fionas:11   Donalds:5
Sub 2000:7   Hewitts:8
Wainwrights:10   
Joined: Jan 11, 2009
Location: Tillicoultry

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby jmarkb » Thu May 29, 2014 9:03 am

It's an old SMC tradition: I quite like it!
User avatar
jmarkb
Mountaineer
 
Posts: 5857
Munros:246   Corbetts:105
Fionas:91   Donalds:32
Sub 2000:46   
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby gman » Thu May 29, 2014 10:57 am

I don't like it :lol:. I always thought it was anachronistic as Munro wouldn't have used that spelling, and a wee bit pretentious. The SMC say they've adopted the old spelling as a nod to Walton, but are using it as a verb so it doesn't really make sense...unless they mean you haven't definitively completed if you haven't registered with them? So it's a recent tradition, possibly started by the SMC to keep them connected to the growing numbers of Munro baggers. Maybe I'll change my mind after I complete & start using ye olde English for emails :lol:
User avatar
gman
 
Posts: 827
Munros:250   Corbetts:4
Sub 2000:1   
Joined: Sep 12, 2011

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby RyanfaeScotland » Thu May 29, 2014 12:52 pm

I always thought the majority of completest were as old they just didn't know there was a new term for it. :wink:
User avatar
RyanfaeScotland
Mountain Walker
 
Posts: 499
Munros:8   Corbetts:1
Fionas:1   
Sub 2000:4   
Joined: Feb 26, 2013

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby jmarkb » Thu May 29, 2014 12:59 pm

RyanfaeScotland wrote:I always thought the majority of completest were as old they just didn't know there was a new term for it. :wink:


Bah - cheeky youth :roll:
User avatar
jmarkb
Mountaineer
 
Posts: 5857
Munros:246   Corbetts:105
Fionas:91   Donalds:32
Sub 2000:46   
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby holtlynx » Fri May 30, 2014 3:10 pm

Well for what it's worth I quite like the archaism
holtlynx
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Jan 28, 2009
Location: Glasgow

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby Stevebruce1405 » Sun May 22, 2022 9:02 am

I think it’s from the French meaning “like peat”… compeat
Must have gained an l somewhere along the way 😂
Stevebruce1405
Walker
 
Posts: 1
Munros:7   
Islands:29
Joined: Aug 5, 2020

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby Sgurr » Mon May 23, 2022 6:05 pm

I wrote about "compleating" the Munros because everyone seemed to at the time. However, Corbetts and Grahams seemed much more scientifically defined and less subjective, so I wrote about "completing" them as with the Donalds. I don't know what people say about the Wainwrights which I am after now. I just want to get to 214, but probably won't "compleat"/"complete"/"bag 'em all." As to Hewitts, they just seem to spring up on the box to my right, and I have no idea how much longer it would take me to finish them, or what they really are...a list too far, I suspect.
User avatar
Sgurr
Munro compleatist
 
Posts: 5679
Munros:282   Corbetts:222
Fionas:219   Donalds:89+52
Sub 2000:569   Hewitts:172
Wainwrights:214   Islands:58
Joined: Nov 15, 2010
Location: Fife

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby simon-b » Mon May 23, 2022 8:29 pm

One way of looking at it: the dictionary definition of to complete is to make whole or perfect. Therefore the Munros were completed by the natural forces that created Scotland's geography and geology. So to compleat the Munros means to complete the task of climbing all the Munros.
User avatar
simon-b
Munro compleatist
 
Posts: 2347
Munros:282   Corbetts:30
Fionas:7   Donalds:12
Sub 2000:1   Hewitts:155
Wainwrights:214   Islands:4
Joined: Jan 2, 2012
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby 1Magnus » Tue May 24, 2022 7:19 am

Recommend reading Andrew Dempster's The Munros: A History (2021). That contains some information on munroing vocabulary.
1Magnus
Mountain Walker
 
Posts: 101
Munros:150   
Joined: Apr 18, 2015
Location: Crail

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby Tinto63 » Tue May 24, 2022 10:53 pm

Compleat / compleation / compleatist / compleating : all pretentious and antediluvian.
User avatar
Tinto63
Wanderer
 
Posts: 985
Munros:129   Corbetts:46
Fionas:38   Donalds:89
Sub 2000:30   
Joined: Jul 20, 2011
Location: West Lothian

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby iain_atkinson_1986 » Wed May 25, 2022 7:33 am

Am I the only one who just says "I've done the Munros"?

:?
iain_atkinson_1986
Munro compleatist
 
Posts: 684
Munros:83   Corbetts:216
Fionas:20   Donalds:16+9
Sub 2000:4   
Joined: Jul 27, 2016
Location: Inverness

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby Moriarty » Wed May 25, 2022 7:52 am

Tinto63 wrote:Compleat / compleation / compleatist / compleating : all pretentious and antediluvian.


Do you have a similar analysis for the use of the word antediluvian? :wink:

Compleat seems to be one of those rather twee oddities that tend to emerge in somewhat niche interest groups. I'm sure the trainspotters and stamp collectors will have their own.

If it makes folk happy...
Moriarty
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Dec 15, 2013

Re: Compleat or complete?

Postby CharlesT » Wed May 25, 2022 8:41 am

Tinto63 wrote:Compleat / compleation / compleatist / compleating : all pretentious and antediluvian.

Do I detect a hint of irony in your use of antediluvian or are you just being provocatively pretentious or maybe pretentiously provocative?
User avatar
CharlesT
Mountaineer
 
Posts: 4502
Munros:156   Corbetts:2
Hewitts:262
Wainwrights:214   Islands:2
Joined: Dec 22, 2011
Location: West Oxfordshire

Next



Can you help support Walkhighlands?


Our forum is free from adverts - your generosity keeps it running.
Can you help support Walkhighlands and this community by donating by direct debit?



Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DopeyLoser and 16 guests