Stay at home
Scotland is under national lockdown. People are asked to stay at home except for essential purposes.
Click for details
A question for the photographers....
by Caberfeidh » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:08 pm
- Posts: 7365
- Joined: Feb 5, 2009
by CharlesT » Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:53 pm
alanhid90 wrote:In short I would go for the Nikon.........bought the D3200 last year and very happy with it on the hills.
Can anyone recommend a good tripod for the hills - I was looking at the manfrotto beefree due to its compact size/weight but open to suggestions.
Giottos Memoire 50. Not the cheapest or lightest at 1.2 kg but folds down very compactly, comes with own carry case and is robust enough to take a 3 kg camera load. Think I paid about £ 80 for mine.
by TheFox » Fri Jan 30, 2015 1:08 am
The big question for you to decide is - compact (including Bridge) or system camera, and if a system camera, DSLR or DSLM.
It only makes sense to go for a DSLR or DSLM if you are willing to put in a bit of time and learn the basics of exposure, white balance etc., i.e. leave the auto modes. Only that way you will get great results. As for DSLR vs. DSLM - DSLM are smaller and usually lighter, thus well suited for outdoor activities. The ergonomics are however worse, and many still prefer a DSLR's optical viewfinder over a DSLM's electronic one (essentially just another screen).
Normally it wouldn't be too important whether you go Nikon, Canon, Pentax or whatever, but for outdoor activities I recommend a weather sealed model. Pentax is famous for building extremely rugged, weather sealed DSLRs that are as good as, if not better than those of the more well known brands (CaNikon). I use a Pentax K3 and when out in the highlands it doesn't go into my backpack when it rains - it just doesn't care. There is an infamous video of a US soldier in Afghanistan first heaping sand from sandbags over his Pentax DSLR, then rinsing the stuff off in the shower
The Pentax K50 or its successor, which is about to be released shortly, are both cameras that are roughly on the same level as the Nikon D5300 and Canon 700D, but they offer more for the price, most importantly weather sealing, a larger and brighter viewfinder and a second control wheel (something you will love once you get into manual settings).
If you'd prefer a smaller package, among the DSLMs the Olympus OMD EM1 or its cheaper (but still very good) predecessor, the EM5, are both rugged, weather sealed and highly regarded.
by Gareth Harper » Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:47 pm
I was really pleased with it, though it wasn't great at higher ISO ratings.
I later bagged a Panasonic 12-35f2.8 which is now the only lens I use with my Compact Camera System (CCS).
Despite the basic sensor, as long as you don't push the ISO too far 20 inch prints are no problem.
Last year I upgraded the body to a Panasonic GH3.
CCS is just a DSLR without the pentaprism and mirror. In other words you no longer have the big and bulky optical viewfinder. Both the G1 and GH3 that I have have an EVF (electronic viewfinder). You use the camera pretty much just as you would an SLR except that you are using that electronic viewfinder. And of course the camera and the lens are now much smaller and lighter than with the SLR.
But yeah I agree with what some of the others have said. You can pick up used cameras for buttons. So if you go for something that is a few years old but in good nick, well you could afford to experiment.
Anyway, here's what I used to use when walking the - 5D (purchased in 2005) in the middle, then the G1 on the left and now the GH3 with the 12-35f2.8 which is equivalent to the lens fitted to the Canon in the middle. I find it a good compromise.
by IamAJMiller » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:15 am
PS I'm going to an indoor music festival this weekend so if anyone has any tips on how to take good pics in such a dark enviroment (but with bright stage lights) I'd love to hear them.
by TheFox » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:34 pm
IamAJMiller wrote:PS I'm going to an indoor music festival this weekend so if anyone has any tips on how to take good pics in such a dark enviroment (but with bright stage lights) I'd love to hear them.
Indoor and darkness are a real challenge for any proper DSLR, they require very good high-ISO capabilities and a fast (f/2.8 or better) lens. Hate to say it but with a bridge ... forget it You can try of course, but don't expect any good results.
by Michael Thomson » Fri Feb 20, 2015 12:08 pm
My advice: Forget trying to photograph it and just enjoy the music!
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Aug 18, 2011
by IamAJMiller » Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:32 pm
Michael Thomson wrote:My advice: Forget trying to photograph it and just enjoy the music!
Indeed, I'm all about enjoying the moment but wanted a few snaps to remind me of the event, combined with playing with my new toy! As it turns out you were both right, it was hard, but I got some good pics in among the blurry rubbish ones! P.S. The music was phenomenal!
by Riverman » Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:36 pm
by TheFox » Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:43 pm
Riverman wrote:Film still has its uses.
To be honest, the use of film nowadays is 90% due to nostalgia. There is a beauty in simplicity and film can render beautifully, especially in black and white - your image is a fine example.
But modern digital sensors beat film in pretty much every respect, from dynamic range to versatility (free to set whatever ISO one requires) and ease of post processing. The results of even entry level DSLRs will blow away anything you can get from film.
by Riverman » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:57 pm
Results depend on the photographer You're right though. Even aps c size sensors are so good these days there's no point shooting C41 in 35mm anymore and little point using full frame digital really (unless tied to favourite wide angle lenses from a film system or need to print bigger than maybe 16x20 inches). I've got rid of my full frame digital and my medium and large format film systems but hang onto a 35mm system for black and white work and a Ricoh GR digital. Black and white film will clearly outlive color slide and print film. Large format landcape is the last bastion though and the movements and ability to alter focal plane are part of the reason. Tilting and shifting in digital requires super expensive lenses wheras in LF it's a feature of every camera and scope to tilt and shift is limited only by the camera's movements and the lens' image circle.TheFox wrote:The results of even entry level DSLRs will blow away anything you can get from film.Riverman wrote:Film still has its uses.
I made this shot on Fuji Provia 4x5 inch film with a wooden field camera and a Nikkor 200mm lens. I had to wake at 5am and walk over an hour from the camping spot to climb the dune and be ready for day break. The film has been scanned on a cheapo epson flat bed and cropped to a panorama. There are few digital cameras below 30 grand that would capture as much data as a proper drum scan of this slide. Clicking the image should open to the correct dimensions. Clearly though dragging around a LF rig is a real pain in the butt which is why I stopped doing it not long after getting into munro bagging.
by tenohfive » Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:20 pm
Riverman wrote:I made this shot on Fuji Provia 4x5 inch film with a wooden field camera and a Nikkor 200mm lens. I had to wake at 5am and walk over an hour from the camping spot to climb the dune and be ready for day break. The film has been scanned on a cheapo epson flat bed and cropped to a panorama. There are few digital cameras below 30 grand that would capture as much data as a proper drum scan of this slide. Clicking the image should open to the correct dimensions. Clearly though dragging around a LF rig is a real pain in the butt which is why I stopped doing it not long after getting into munro bagging.
That is rather special.
by IamAJMiller » Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:22 pm
by electricfly » Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:27 am
That is rather special.
It sure is.
Not only does it capture incredible detail of the landscape, but also, (when you click to enlarge) a few stray pubes and specs of grit on the lens!
by TheFox » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:25 pm
Riverman wrote:Results depend on the photographer
Not exclusively I know there is a trend to say that it's only personal skills that matter and obviously the best camera will not help much if you have no clue about exposure or composition at all, but there's really more to it. It's difficult situations where better cameras really shine. No compact camera will struggle with an evenly lit scene on a sunny day, but try to take pictures of the milky way, of landscapes involving high dynamic ranges (which is most of them), of low-light (= high-ISO) evening scenes or fast-paced action sports.
Both personal skills (in exposure, composition, post-processing etc.) and your equipment matter.
... and little point using full frame digital really (unless tied to favourite wide angle lenses from a film system or need to print bigger than maybe 16x20 inches).
While I'm personally fine with APS-C and some nice glass, there's definitely more to FF than just printing large or using wide-angle lenses. Cameras like the Nikon D810 have unrivalled dynamic range which makes them great for landscape and astro work, they have considerably better high-ISO performance than APS-C and produce a shallower depth-of-field at the same aperture which is useful in portraiture.
I made this shot on Fuji Provia 4x5 inch film with a wooden field camera and a Nikkor 200mm lens.
That's a great shot, I really like it
Walkhighlands community forum is advert free
Can you help support Walkhighlands and the online community by donating by direct debit?