tony.cee wrote:al78 wrote:
Unfortunately from what I see on Yahoo and BBC comments sections (ugh!) there are a minority who seem to want just that, presumably people who are priviliged enough to live with their loved ones, so don't live alone, physically cut off from their friends and family, and have no desire for physical human affection or get it from who they live with.
I despair too when I read comment sections. The people rooting for self imposed imprisonment are entitled to continue to isolate themselves forever if they want to, nobody is going to be kicking in doors and dragging them out. However, I expect a huge swing in public opinion when furlough draws to an end. Worth keeping in mind that there is a very vocal section of society who want the hills fenced off to the insured only, but that’s a different can of worms.
The “five mile” limit is to be taken as seriously as the “one hour” of exercise. Which if anyone has strava, wasn’t taken seriously at all.
Spot on about Strava. Being cynical & truthful at the same time, cyclists have 'never had it so good' since lockdown - the furloughed have had the freedom to explore, less cars on the roads and, well, in April at least, good weather. Plenty cyclists I know and follow via Strava have clocked up rides that have taken them out for hours - 3-4-5 hours not uncommon, and for some, 40 miles from home at the furthest point on their ride. It is surely the most elastic definition yet of keeping it local.
What worries me - in the absence of a authoritative statement from Police or the FM or someone with a bit of clout - is that those hillwalkers who do venture out find a hostile environment; damage to cars whilst you are up the hills, cars blocked in, run in's with local's, or police who might force their own interpretation of the regulations on parties. To prevent all these mishaps, I look forward to seeing within the week a clear, consistent and definitive statement on where we stand.