Page 1 of 2

Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2017 7:50 pm
by Pensioner
I was getting withdrawal symptoms not having done any serious scrambling for well over 6 months. After the wet early spring the forecast of a dry and sunny weekend sent me searching online and thumbing through my guidebooks for a suitable grade 1/2 route. The challenge was where to go? I live in Preston and had done most of the 3 star routes in the Lakes and Wales such as Striding Edge, Sharp Edge, Jacks Rake, Tryfan N Ridge, Crib Goch and Bristly Ridge etc. I was running out of clean good routes within 100 miles. In addition to running out of options I decided that the Lakes would be too busy and happened upon a recommended route named the Daear Ddu ridge on the back of a hill called Moel Siabod near Capel Curig. It seemed to be sustained grade 1 so off I went early one bright sunny Sunday morning. I knew there were roadworks on the A55 at Colwyn Bay which had been causing misery but my sat nav took me off at Abergele and after negotiating some very narrow roads and an altercation with a pick-up truck I arrived at Capel Curig and parked, eventually.

The approach from Pont Cyfyng was along a very boggy track through some atmospheric abandoned quarry workings. The bog became tedious but eventually my objective came into sight and in silhouette it looked rather impressive with the promise of some airy scrambling. After negotiating some more gooey boot sucking gunk I arrived at the bottom of the ridge. The day had held fair with a mix of sun and clouds but it certainly wasn’t the wall-to-wall sunshine forecast by the BBC. I started off over some boulders and soon arrived at an interesting-looking steep smooth corner which could be avoided on the right. This proved to be quite awkward and greasy with a few delicate moves to regain the crest. This was definitely into rock climbing territory and certainly at grade 2. Great I thought “bring it on”. However, unfortunately that was it. The ridge belied its appearance and the rest of it was just a steep walk with a few problems here and there. From above it appeared well defined but apart from the initial steep corner, which can be bypassed, it offered no real interest unless you count some impressive slabs and drop-offs. Its barely grade 1.

After one final scramble section I arrived on the summit rather disappointed and unsatisfied. Well at least it was a great day with extensive views and the brooding sawtooth of Tryfan grabbing the attention to the west. I had even got some exercise and honed my skills in ploutering through bogs! The long boulder strewn summit shoulder yielded a few problems before giving way to long soggy grass slopes leading down to the Capel Curig path on the north side. I use the description “path” reservedly because it was a hazardous mixture of water course, cork screws, slippery bog, rock-ribs, ankle breaking rocks and rock bands. Apart from that it was fine! And to cap it all I spent 30mins crawling through the roadworks on the A55. I would not recommend this route.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2017 10:51 pm
by Mal Grey
Sorry you didn't enjoy it much, but I think its a fine way to ascend an excellent mountain, its just nothing like Tryfan etc, not much is. I found by picking out the hardest bits I had plenty of modest scrambling to keep me entertained. I agree that its not particularly serious, but wasn't expecting it to be.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 8:54 pm
by Pensioner
Thanks for your comments Mal. I wouldn't describe Moel Siabod as an "excellent hill" - it's a pretty average hill. But then again I have been spoiled by cutting my climbing teeth in the Western Highlands where there are many Tryfans, Crib Gochs, Jacks Rake and Sharp Edges. A hill like Moel Siabod would not be noticed at all.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:06 pm
by mattcymru
Bit harsh calling Siabod a hill... it is 2861 feet. if you drive from abergele to llanrwst it looks like a huge mountain! :?

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:25 pm
by Mal Grey
mattcymru wrote:Bit harsh calling Siabod a hill... it is 2861 feet. if you drive from abergele to llanrwst it looks like a huge mountain! :?


Indeed, and I'm happy to defend it again. My own report is here; viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19310

I obviously look at things in a different way, finding joy in just being out there; Pensioner has made 3 hill reports, each one expressing disappointment with the hill, which is a bit of a shame. I guess its all about expectations, and I get that some folk need the fun scrambly bits to motivate them, but though I love those parts, just being out there is all the reward I need.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:35 pm
by Pensioner
If you've been brought up hillwalking in Scotland as I have all my, life the term "hill" is used in climbing parlance to refer to any Scottish mountain even The Cuillin. The exception is "I'm going up the Ben" which means Ben Nevis. I climbed Cnicht a few weeks after, from which I saw Moel Siabod, and I wasn't impressed with it either. Simon Ingram in his interesting book "Between the Sunset and the Sea" raves about Cnicht as if it's some mythical creation. I couldn't see what all the fuss was about.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:00 am
by dav2930
It's all relative I suppose, isn't it? I guess continentals used to climbing in the Alps wouldn't be that impressed by the West Highlands. And Himalayan veterans might think the Alps a bit paltry. But then again real mountaineers like Bonnington and Hinkes have time and again expressed their deep love and appreciation for the British hills when they return from an expedition. 'Mountains', 'hills' - what does it matter what you call them? A rose by any other name smells as sweet.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:42 pm
by HalfManHalfTitanium
What a curious report.

Frank Smythe, who made the first ascent of a 25,000 ft peak (Kamet, in 1931) knew a thing or two about hills.

He expressed enormous admiration for Cnicht in his book Over Welsh Hills (1941), stating that Cnicht equalled Kamet in beauty.

In my own small way, I've made the first ascents of some 6000m peaks in Argentina, and climbed in different parts of the Andes, the Himalayas and the Alps. I also love the West Highlands, of course. But that in no way diminishes the affection I have for the marvellous Moel Siabod or the stunning Cnicht.

It's about enjoying every hill for itself, not about some scale on which one hill is ranked better than another. The Walkhighlands "user ratings" reflect not some arbitrary scrambling grade, but walkers' experience of enjoyment and affection.
- Cnicht has a rating of 4.68 (higher than that of any Munro)
- Moel Siabod's rating is 4.42 (which is higher than all but 19 Munros)

Let's just enjoy them all. In the words of Hamish Brown - "The hills are bigger than the sum of all our little games".

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:10 pm
by HalfManHalfTitanium
By the way, here's another perspective on Moel Siabod - from two non-disappointed adults and two very happy 14-year-old lads. https://www.walkhighlands.co.uk/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=63322

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:04 pm
by mattcymru
great stuff! i see the pensioner isnt here. i have seen siabod for many years but still not been up. the great orme is about the most i can amnage at the moment. :?

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:25 pm
by davekermito
Surprising report this one Pensioner.

I walked up MS via the Daear Ddu ridge with my 7 year old son and whilst it's not Aonach Eagach it's a fun scramble from start to the fell top finish. The descent along the ridge instead of the tourist path is great fun too, whilst not taxing.

I hope you can find a route that cheers you up soon!

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:34 pm
by Sgurr
This couple of pensioners really enjoyed Moel Siabod

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 10:25 pm
by Graeme D
I very much enjoyed Siabod! :D

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:56 am
by Pensioner
Hi HalfManHalfTitanium. I completely agree with your sentiments about enjoying the hills for what they are and resisting the temptation to rank them but given the large variation in mountain form and disposition, the latter is just human nature. My mountaineering achievements are not comparable to yours but I know and appreciate a thing or two about mountains and I wouldn't change my assessment of Moel Siabod and Cnicht.

I too have widely read the mountaineering literature including books by Shipton, Brown, Tilman, Duke of the Abruzzi, Bowman, Unsworth, Bonnington and Borthwick. I recently enjoyed a very evocative book "The Last Hillwalker" by John Burns.

I do not visit or post to this forum often and I am grateful to you for pointing out the tables of user ratings. I couldn't believe that Cnicht has been ranked higher than Blencathra or Helvellyn to name but a few! I mean Cnicht doesn't even shine a light on Sharp Edge or Jacks Rake! Only the last 50m or so onto Cnicht's summit involves any kind of scrambling. In the list of Hewitts 15% are ranked higher than 4.0, whereas 23% of Munros have a user rating greater than 4.0. It is interesting to examine the corresponding Most Climbed tables which I suggest are a better indication of the popularity of these hills. Moel Siabod and Cnicht are respectively placed 121 and 130 out of 316.

Re: Moel Siabod disappoints

PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:51 pm
by Borderhugh
Like most folk on this site, I am miffed with your report. Moel Siabod via Daer Dhu is a truly memorable hill. Hills like this fuel my urge to go back to Wales on an annual basis.