Inconsistent hill ratings
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 9:57 am
(Trying to keep the Donalds thread from going even more off topic by not posting this there!)
Something a bit odd is going on with the English ratings - I was having a look at Scafell, which would be my first pick for the English section of the 'new' list, and discovered that it was only 13th out of the English Hewitts (12th of the Wainwrights on the Hewitt list), with a rating of 4.00. But then when I look at the Wainwright list, Scafell is at the top with a rating of 4.85.
Is this intentional? Do people rate Scafell more highly if they're comparing it to Slight Side than if they're comparing it to Broad Crag and Ill Crag? But it's still weird that the same hills are coming out in such a different order!
Something a bit odd is going on with the English ratings - I was having a look at Scafell, which would be my first pick for the English section of the 'new' list, and discovered that it was only 13th out of the English Hewitts (12th of the Wainwrights on the Hewitt list), with a rating of 4.00. But then when I look at the Wainwright list, Scafell is at the top with a rating of 4.85.
Is this intentional? Do people rate Scafell more highly if they're comparing it to Slight Side than if they're comparing it to Broad Crag and Ill Crag? But it's still weird that the same hills are coming out in such a different order!